6.1 Specifications

Table of Contents

Return to the Table of Contents for this section at any time by selecting Return to Table of Contents. Users may also navigate through the entire Observer's Handbook by using the complete Table of Contents menu to the right.

6.1   Specifications

6.1.1   Instrument Overview

The German REceiver for Astronomy at Terahertz Frequencies (GREAT) is a dual channel heterodyne instrument that will provide high resolution spectra (up to R = 108) in several frequency windows in the 0.490–4.74477749 THz range.

The front-end unit consists of two independent dewars that operate simultaneously. Each dewar contains one of the following channels:

upGREAT Low Frequency Array (LFA)

The LFA is a 14-pixel array (two polarizations and times; 7 pixels) arranged in a hexagonal geometry with a central beam. The current tuning range of the LFA is approximately 1.810–2.070 THz.
upGREAT High Frequency Array (HFA)
The HFA is a 7-pixel array arranged in a hexagonal geometry with a central beam. The tuning range of the HFA is limited to the [OI] frequency of 4.74477749 THz (+/- 100 km/s LSR velocity).
4GREAT consists of four co-aligned (to within a few arcsec) pixels at four different frequencies. The tuning ranges of these pixels are 490–635 GHz (Herschel/HIFI band 1), 890–1100 GHz (Herschel/HIFI band 4), 1200–1500 GHz (GREAT L1 channel), and 2490–2590 GHz (GREAT M channel).

The GREAT instrument uses Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) spectrometers as backends. Each XFFTS spectrometer has a bandwidth of 2.5 GHz and 64,000 channels, providing a resolution of 44 kHz. The beam size is close to the diffraction limit—about 14 arcsec at 160 μm.

A detailed description of the GREAT instrument and its performance during Basic Science can be found in the GREAT special issue (Heyminck et al. 2012, A&A, 542, L1). The LFA is described in Risacher et al. 2016 (A&A, 595, A34). Because the instrument is regularly being upgraded and its performance improved, always check the GREAT website for the latest information.

Return to Table of Contents   Design

Heterodyne receivers work by mixing the signal from a source at a given frequency νs with that from a local oscillator (LO) at a specified (and precisely controlled) frequency νLO and amplifying the result. The mixing results in two frequency bands, called the signal and the image bands, located symmetrically on either side of νLO and separated from νLO by the intermediate frequency νIF = |ν– νLO|. GREAT operates in double sideband mode, i.e. both the image and signal bands are equally sensitive to incoming radiation. By definition the spectral line of interest is always placed in the signal band, which can be chosen to be either above (Upper Sideband, USB) or below the LO frequency (Lower Sideband, LSB); see Figure 6-1. For sources rich in spectral lines, care has to be taken so that a spectral line in the image band does not overlap or blend with the line in the signal band.

Figure 6-1.
Diagram showing how heterodyne receiver works

Figure 6-1. Schematics of one GREAT receiver channel. The second mixer-stage is needed to match the ope­­ra­tional frequencies of the first mixer-element to that of the microwave spectrometer.

Return to Table of Contents   Configurations

The channels that are currently operational are listed in Table 6-1. Not every frequency in each tuning range has been checked, so there may be gaps where the LOs do not provide enough power to pump the mixer.

Table 6-1: GREAT Configurations
Table 6-1: GREAT Configurations
Front-End Frequencies (GHz) Lines of Interest DSB5 Receiver Temperatures (K)
upGREAT LFA 1810–2070 [OI], [CΙΙ], CO, OH2π1/2 1000
upGREAT HFA 4744.77749 [OI] 1100
4GREAT 490–6351 NH3, [CI], CO, CH 120
890–11002 CO, CS 350
1200–15003 [NII], CO, OD, HCN, SH, H2D+ 800
2490–2590 OH2π3/2 18OH2π3/2  1500
1Herschel/HIFI Band 1
2Herschel/HIFI Band 4
3GREAT L1 channel
4GREAT M channel
5DSB = Dual Sideband

In Cycle 8, GREAT offers two configurations:

This configuration employs the Low Frequency Array (LFA) in one dewar and the High Frequency Array (HFA) in the second dewar. The LFA array consists of 2 x 7 pixels (H and V polarizations) and the HFA consists of seven pixels. At the frequency of the CII line, 1900.536 GHz, the frequency coverage of both LFA polarizations overlap and all 14 pixels are in operation. At higher and lower frequencies, only one LFA polarization will be available and only seven LFA pixels can be operated at a given time.
This configuration implements 4GREAT in one dewar and the HFA in the second dewar. The 4GREAT pixels are aligned on the sky to within several arcseconds.

Each of the two installed mixers is provided with XFFTS Fast Fourier Transform spectrometers. The XFFTS has a 2.5 GHz bandwidth and 64,000 channels, providing a resolution of 44 kHz.

The usable instantaneous bandwidth is generally less than that covered by the XFFTS, generally about 1-1.5 GHz. The tuning range of the HFA is limited because the LO (a Quantum Cascade Laser) can only be tuned in discrete steps.

Return to Table of Contents

6.1.2   Performance   Imaging Sensitivities

The GREAT sensitivities and integration times are calculated with the SOFIA Instrument Time Estimator (SITE). Presented here are the background of these calculations and some worked out examples. Because of the way a heterodyne receiver is calibrated (by measuring the receiver temperature, Trx, with a hot and a cold load), the logical intensity unit for a heterodyne observation is temperature, expressed in Kelvin (K). Either the antenna temperature, TA* (the asterisk refers to values after correction for sky transmission, telescope losses and rearward spillover, see e.g. Kutner and Ulich, ApJ, 250, 341 (1981)) or the main beam brightness temperature, Tmb, are used. Similarly, the noise is expressed in temperature units as well, ΔTA * or ΔTmb, and the sensitivity (or signal-to-noise ratio) of the observations is given by the ratio of the source temperature and the rms temperature of the spectrum. In order to calculate these quantities, we first must estimate the single sideband (SSB) system temperature, Tsys, which also includes losses from the atmosphere and the telescope. Tsys is given by:

Tsys = 2 x [Trx + ηtelJ x Tsky + ηtel x Ts + Ttel ] /( ηtel x ηsky)

Trx is the dual sideband (DSB) receiver temperature
Tsky is the radiation temperature of the sky
Ts is the continuum temperature of the source; This term is usually completely negligible (unless observing an extremely bright object such as Jupiter, Saturn, or Sgr B2) and is therefore set to 0 in the GREAT time estimator.
Ttel is the Rayleigh-Jeans telescope temperature
ηsky is the fraction of radiation transmitted through the atmosphere
ηtel is the efficiency of the telescope, which includes ohmic losses and spillover

The factor 2 in Equation 6-1 assumes that the noise temperature is the same in both signal and image band, which is true for the HEB mixers used by GREAT. The transmission of the atmosphere, ηsky, at the altitude, observing frequency, and airmass that we plan to observe at can be estimated using the atmospheric transmission code ATRAN. The GREAT time estimator calls ATRAN directly, so those estimating the integration time needed by using the time estimator have no need to run ATRAN separately. Tsky depends on ηsky and the ambient temperature of the sky (Tamb) where the signal is absorbed and can be derived from Equation 6-2.

(Eq. 6-2)
Tsky = J(Tamb) x (1 - ηsky)

where J(Tamb) is the mean Rayleigh-Jeans (R-J) temperature of the atmosphere, which we assume to have a physical temperature of 220 K at 41,000 ft, resulting in J(Tamb) = 177.5 K at 1.9 THz. Likewise the telescope temperature, Ttel, is related to ηtel by Equation 6-3:

(Eq. 6-3)
Ttel = Jtel x (1 - ηtel)

where Jtel is the radiation temperature of the telescope, with a physical temperature ~ 230 K (Jtel = 187.4 K at 1.9 THz). If we assume an ηtel of 0.92, then Ttel = 14.8 K.

As an example, let us calculate the system temperature at the [CII] fine structure line at 157.74 μm (1.9005369 THz). In this example we calculate what we would have at the beginning of a flight, when we are still at low altitude. We therefore assume that we fly at an altitude of 39,000 ft and observe at an elevation of 30 degree. For a standard atmospheric model this corresponds to a transmission of ~ 76%, which gives Tsky = 42.6 K. For a receiver temperature Trc = 1100 K, Equation 6-1 therefore predicts a single sideband system temperature Tsys = 3301 K when observing the sky.

Now we are ready to calculate the sensitivity. The rms antenna temperature, (corrected for the atmospheric absorption, and telescope losses), ΔTA*, for both position switching
and beam switching is given by Equation 6-4

(Eq. 6-4)
ΔTA* = (2 x Tsys x κ ) x (t x Δν)-0.5

where k is the backend degradation factor, t is the total integration time of the number of on and off pairs that we plan to take, and Δν is the frequency resolution of our spectra. Strictly speaking, Δν is the noise bandwidth, which can be slightly different than the frequency resolution, depending on the design of the spectrometer. For our example we expect the Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) of the line to be a few km/s, and we will therefore calculate the rms for a velocity resolution of 1 km/s, corresponding to a frequency resolution of 6.3 MHz. Since the GREAT backends have much higher resolution, this is not a problem. We can easily bin the spectrum to our desired velocity resolution. For an observation with three pairs of 40 seconds in each beam, or t = 4 min, and assuming the backend degradation factor k=1, we then find ΔTA* = 0.17 K, which is the one sigma rms antenna temperature.

To convert antenna temperature to brightness temperature TR*, we have to make one more correction as shown in Equation 6-5:

(Eq. 6-5)
TR* = TA* / ηfss

where ηfss is the forward scattering efficiency, usually measured for a very extended source (like the Moon). For GREAT ηfss = 0.97. Therefore our brightness rms temperature, ΔTR* = 0.18 K5. Note: The GREAT time estimator assumes the line temperature in TR*, and not in main beam brightness temperature, Tmb = TR*MB , which is for a source that just fills the main beam.

If we want to express our results in flux density, Sn, rather than brightness temperature, we can convert antenna temperature, TA, to flux density, Sν, using the standard relation given in Equation 6-6:

(Eq. 6-6)
Sν = 2 x κ x ηfss x TA* / Aeff  

where κ is the Boltzmann constant, and Aeff is the effective area of the telescope. Aeff is related to the geometrical surface area of the telescope, Ag, by the aperture efficiency, ηa,
i.e. Aeff = ηa x Ag. For the measured main beam efficiency in early April 2013 (0.67) and a Half Power Beam Width (HPBW) of ~ 14.1 arcsec (+/- 0.3 arcsec) an aperture efficiency6 of 55 +/- 2 % is derived. Equation 6-7 yields the following simple form for the 2.5 m SOFIA telescope:

(Eq. 6-7)
S (Jy) = 971 x TA* (K) or within errors ~ 1000 x TA* (K)

Normally we use Jy only for spatially unresolved sources, but we can also use Equation 6-7 to convert line intensities into W/m2, which maybe a more familiar unit for the far infrared community. If we assume that the [CII] line we are observing is a Gaussian with a Full With Half Maximum (FWHM) of = 5 km/s, i.e. 31.8 MHz, the integrated line intensity is given by 1.065 x Tpeak x Δν, where Δν = 31.8 MHz. If we take Tpeak equal to our rms antenna temperature, we find using Equation 6-7 that our four minute integration therefore corresponds to a one sigma brightness limit of ~ 6.1 10-17 W/m2 for a 5 km/s wide line observed with 1 km/s resolution. If we only aim for a detection, we can probably degrade the resolution to 2 km/s. In this case we gain a square root of 2, and therefore our one sigma detection limit is 4.3⋅10-17 W/m2.

This is the reverse of what is typical when writing a proposal, when the proposer has an estimate how wide and how bright the line is expected to be and knows what signal to noise is needed for the analysis. Assume we want to observe the [CII] 158 μm line in T Tauri, a young low-mass star. Podio et al. (2012, A&A, 545, A44) find a line intensity of 7.5 ⋅10-16 W m-2 for the Herschel PACS observations, which are unresolved in velocity (the PACS velocity resolution is ~ 240 km/s for [CII]). Here we want to velocity resolve the line to see if it is outflow dominated or whether it is emitted from a circumstellar disk or both. We therefore need a velocity resolution of 1 km/s or better. If we assume that the line is outflow dominated with a FWHM of say 20 km/s (127.2 MHz; little or no contribution from the circumstellar disk) we get a peak antenna temperature (using Equation 6-7) of 0.52 K or a radiation temperature TR* = 0.55 K. In this case we want a SNR of at least 10 and a velocity resolution of 1 km/s or better. Let’s check whether it is feasible. If we plug in the values we have in the GREAT time estimator (assume 40 degrees elevation, standard atmosphere, and we fly at 41,000 ft) or we can estimate it from the equations given above.

With these assumptions ATRAN gives us an atmospheric transmission of 0.86 integrated over the receiver band-pass. The receiver temperature is 1100 K (DSB). Using Equation 6-2, we find that the sky only adds 24.9 K to the system temperature and from Equation 6-1 we therefore get Tsys = 2881 K. Since we want to reach a signal to noise of 10, the rms antenna temperature ΔTA* = 0.052 K. We can now solve for the integration time using Equation 6-4, where we set Δν = 6.338 MHz (1 km/s resolution). In this case t = 1937 sec or 32.3 min. The PACS observations show the emission to be compact, so we can do the observations in Dual Beam Switching Mode (DBS; see Section, with a chop throw of 60 arcsecond. Both DBS and Total Power (TP) modes are currently estimated to have an overhead of 100% and a setup time for tuning and calibration of two minutes (which get added when entering the observations in USPOT, the SOFIA proposal tool). Our observation would therefore take 60 minutes, which is completely feasible. SITE gives t = 1930 sec. The difference is negligible.

Sensitivity calculations for an On-the-Fly (OTF) map, when data are taken while the telescope is scanning), are done a bit differently. For example, for an OTF map of the [CII] line (Half Power Beam Width, HPBW ~ 14 arcsec), we need to sample the beam about every 7 arcsec. If we read out the average once per second, for example, this means that we scan with a rate of 7 arcsec/second. To do a 3 arcmin scan will therefore take 26 sec, resulting in 26 map points, let us make it 27, to get an odd number of points. We therefore need to spend (1 second) * (√27) = 5.2 seconds on the reference position in total power mode. We ignore the time it takes the telescope to slew to the next row and any time needed for calibration. For a 3 x 3 arcmin2 map, i.e. 27 x 27 positions with a cell size of 7 x 7 arcsec2. The integration time for each row is therefore 5.2 +27 seconds or 32.2 seconds/row. The total integration time for the map is therefore 14.5 minutes. We definitely want to do one repeat, so the total integration time is therefore 29 minutes. For all observing modes, we assume a 100% overhead and 2-minute setup for tuning and calibration. The total duration of the two maps is therefore 61.9 minutes. Thus, a 3 x 3 arcmin2 map in the [C II] line is entirely feasible.

Our 3 by 3 arcmin2 map with one repeat has an integration time of 2 seconds per map point. For typical observing conditions (41,000 feet, 30 degrees elevation) the GREAT time estimator (settings: TP OTF map, Non=27, Classic OTF; see Section 6.2.3) gives us an rms temperature/map point of 0.9 K for a velocity resolution of 1 km/s.

Return to Table of Contents

6.2 Planning Observations

Table of Contents

Return to the Table of Contents for this section at any time by selecting Return to Table of Contents. Users may also navigate through the entire Observer's Handbook by using the complete Table of Contents menu to the right.

6.2   Planning Observations

GREAT instrument configuration and mode flowchart diagram

This section describes the GREAT instrument and the available observing modes. It also contains the information required to estimate observing times in individual modes and examples of each.

If the frequency of interest has not already been used by GREAT, please contact the GREAT team to ensure that observing the line is feasible. There may be gaps where the broadband Local Oscillators do not provide enough power to pump the mixers.

Note: Allan variance affects the capabilities of GREAT and requires special attention when planning observations, see Section for details.

Return to Table of Contents

6.2.1   Observing Modes Overview

Two main observing modes are currently offered: Total Power (TP) and Beam Switching (BSW), the latter of which is available in either Single Beam Switching (SBS) or Dual Beam Switching modes (DBS).

Total Power Mode
In Total Power mode, the telescope alternates between the target and a nearby reference position that is free of emission. From the difference of the target and reference spectra, often called ON–OFF, the GREAT software produces a spectrum, which is largely corrected for atmospheric and instrumental effects. The integration time in this mode depends on the stability of the receiver and how fast the atmosphere fluctuates. The on-source time is typically ≤ 30 seconds, but can be adjusted during the flight if necessary. If shorter integration times are used, one gets a better cancellation of the sky fluctuations, but adds to overheads and therefore reduces the observing efficiency. The ON–OFF cycle is repeated until the required sensitivity is reached.
Total Power mode is used when observing one or a few positions in an extended source or crowded region, such as a large molecular cloud. If the reference position is far from the target position, e.g., 30 arcmin or more, changes in the sky background will result in poor baselines. If the reference position cannot be identified to within 30 arcmin from the source position, an intermediate reference position may be selected for the observations and used to measure this intermediate reference position relative to the far-away, clean reference position. Any contamination in the original spectrum due to emission in the intermediate reference position can then be added back into the data.
Beam Switching Mode
In SBS mode, the secondary mirror is chopping between the target (signal) and a sky position (reference) that is determined by a chop throw and a chop angle. In DBS mode, the telescope then nods so that the beam that was on the reference position is on the source, and the beam that was on the source is at a new reference position (at the distance of the chop throw, and at the chop angle + 180 degrees). Thus, in SBS mode, there is a single reference position, while in DBS mode, there are two reference positions that are equidistant and on opposite sides of the source.
Chopping in either BSW mode is typically done at a rate between 1 and 2.5 Hz. The maximum chop throw should be < 5 arcmin, set by the limits of the chopping secondary. Because the time between the on- and off-source measurements is small (usually ~1 s), this mode results in better sky cancellation and hence better baseline stability. Beam switching is typically used for point or compact sources, because the chop throw has to be larger than half of the source size. Smaller chop throws (60–120 arcsec) are preferred, as large chop throws distort the beam (coma) and uncertainties in the chop throw result in pointing errors if there is a difference between the chop throw and the nod.

Return to Table of Contents   AOTs

GREAT offers four standard methods of observation through Astronomical Observation Templates (AOTs) in USPOT: Single Point, Raster Mapping, On the Fly (OTF) Mapping, and OTF Array Mapping. Each AOT is run in either Total Power or Beam Switching mode.

Single Point
Single Point is used for integrations at a single position on the sky. It is typically used to observe faint sources that require long integration times, or for point sources (sources that are smaller than the beam).
Raster mapping is essentially a collection of single point observations used for creating small maps or strips, where one needs relatively long integration times per map point. A typical example would be a small 3 x 3 map (9 points) with 30 seconds per map point.
In Total Power mode, the telescope nods to a single OFF position away from the source--which is tempurally expensive and results in worse baselines. Total Power mode however is very useful in cases where there is a lot of clutter in the region immedately surrounding the source. 
In BSW, the telescope can more quickly chop then adjust the secondary to form form a pseudo map off-source.
On the Fly and On the Fly Array
In an OTF map, the telescope scans along a row, while the backends are continuously integrating the incoming signal. An average is recorded after the telescope has moved a fraction (typically half to one third) of the beam size. Each average therefore corresponds to a point on the sky with a finite width.
In Total Power mode, each scan is preceded by a measurement of a reference position, where it integrates √N times the integration time per point, where N is the number of points in a row. After a row is completed, the telescope steps about half a beam width in the orthagonal direction and begins a new scan along with reference measurement. 
In Beam Switching mode, the telescope chops while scanning. After a row is completed, the telescope steps about half a beam width in the orthagonal direction and begins a new scan. Note that no additional dedicated reference measurement is needed as in Total Power mode.
This process is repeated until a map of the desired size is constructed. The entire map is repeated until the required sensitivity is reached. An individual map must be rectangular. For a uniform map, the spacing between points along a row (the step size) and the spacing between rows is specified to be the same. When the spacing between rows is specified to be of different values, it is an OTF Array map.
OTF observations are particularly efficient for larger maps of bright lines--however, even for a small map OTF is more efficient as long as the line is bright enough so that one can reach the required signal to noise within several repeats of the map.
When performing observations in Total Power mode, OTF mapping is more efficient than Raster mapping only if the integration time per position is small. Thus, OTF is the preferred mode when mapping the distribution of a relatively bright line over a large area (e.g., a map of the [C II] 158 μm line in a molecular cloud). For faint emission, it is often better to use Raster mapping. The size of the scan is limited by the stability of the receiver and atmosphere and the time spent on the scan is therefore typically limited to less than 30 seconds (20 seconds for the H channel or HFA) in Total Power mode. The typical integration time per position is 1 second per map point, and is usually between 0.3 and 2.0 seconds. For a large map one therefore has to break up the map into a number of sub-maps.

Return to Table of Contents   Spectroscopic Stabilitiy Limitations

The spectroscopic stability (Allan variance) sets limits to the operation of a heterodyne instrument like GREAT. 

BSW mode typically operates with 2.5 Hz, and therefore limitations are mainly set by the atmospheric stability and long integrations are typically performed. As such, integrations with 30 sec phase times are typically implemented for Single Point and OTF observations to achieve optimum spectroscopic stability. For weak and/or broad-line projects, DBS is recommended. No noticeable performance degradation has been observed from using SBS instead of DBS for other projects.

If TP mode observations are requested, the situation becomes complicated and multi-dimensional: science with linewidth more than a few 100 MHz and position changes greater than 10-15 arcmin between the ON and OFF positions become increasingly difficult, though not impossible. The actual impacts will depend on frequency, weather conditions, stability of the sky, elevation of the observation, and on the detector used. Contact a GREAT Instrument Scientist to discuss possible mitigations and their impact on the overheads to be assumed.

Return to Table of Contents

6.2.2   Estimation of Exposure Times

Estimations of exposure times for GREAT can be made using the SOFIA Instrument Time Estimator (SITE). SITE is a web-based tool that calculates either the signal-to-noise ratio for a given line brightness and integration time, or the integration time needed to reach a certain RMS noise level for either one point on the sky or per map position for an OTF map in Total Power mode. These integration times do not include tuning, chopping, slewing, and other observatory overheads. The total time, including all overheads, is determined in USPOT after entering the time calculated by SITESITE is also useful to determine in which sideband the line of interest is best put, taking into account the atmospheric transmission. System temperatures for the line in the USB or LSB are given, as well as a plot showing the line locations for either LO tuning in comparison with the atmospheric transmission.

The time estimator calculates the time required to reach an rms brightness temperature ΔTR* , (TR* = TA*/ ηmb, where ηmb is the forward scattering efficiency and equal to 0.97 for GREAT at all bands) for a line at a frequency ν by solving the standard radiometric formula for a single point. 

ΔTA= (2Tsys) / (tΔν)0.5  

Here, ΔTA* is the antenna temperature corrected for ohmic losses and rear spillover. Tsys is the single sideband system temperature outside the earth's atmosphere, t is the integration time and Δν is the desired frequency resolution. This formula applies when tON = tOFF , as is the case for single point total power observations, and all beam-switched observations.

For Total Power OTF mapping observations the corresponding equation is

TA= Tsys (1 + (1 / Non)0.5)0.5 / (t Δν)0.5

where t the ON-source integration time per map point only and Non is the number of on-source positions for each off-source observation.

The calculator uses the most recent measured receiver temperatures and calls the atmospheric transmission program ATRAN to estimate the atmospheric transmission for a given frequency, altitude, telescope elevation and water vapor overburden. The transmission is used to calculate Tsys, assuming an ambient temperature of the atmosphere of 220 K and a telescope temperature of 230 K.

GREAT is a dual sideband receiver, meaning it receives signal in two frequency bands, the upper sideband (USB) and the lower sideband (LSB). The transmission plot shows the location of both sidebands (separated by +/- 1.5 GHz for the LFA, HFA, and 4GREAT bands 3 and 4, and +/- 5.5 GHz for 4GREAT bands 1 and 2). It is possible to put the line to be observed in either the USB or the LSB (the two possible tunings). Integration times are calculated for both tunings. If the transmission is poor at the lower frequency but very good at the higher frequency, you would tune your line to the lower sideband. If the opposite is true you would tune your line to the upper sideband (USB).

Description of SITE Input Paramters

Type of Observation
Select "Single Point or Beam Switch OTF/Raster Map" for single point observations in both total power and beam-switched mode, and OTF/Raster map observations in beam-switched mode. Select "TP OTF/Raster Map" for OTF/Raster maps in total power mode.

Rest Frequency
Enter the rest frequency (in THz, using 7 decimal places) of the line you wish to observe. The current tuning ranges for the GREAT receivers are listed in Table 6-1.

Frequency or Velocity Resolution
Enter the frequency (in MHz; select the "MHz" radio button) or velocity (in km/s; select the "km/s" radio button) resolution that you want in your final spectrum. Line Width: Enter the frequency (in MHz; select the "MHz" radio button) or velocity (in km/s; select the "km/s" radio button) window that will be used to calculate the atmospheric transmission. Modifying this parameter may be important if the line you wish to observe falls close to a narrow atmospheric feature.

Total Power Map Parameters
For OTF maps: Enter t he number of on positions (dumps) in each OTF scan row in the Non field or have the time estimator calculate this value for you. If you choose to have the estimator calculate it, you should enter the dimensions of the map (in arcsec) and select a "Map Type" option (Classical OTF or Array OTF). For a Classical OTF map, the "Map Size" refers to the area mapped by the central pixel only. For an Array OTF map, the "Map Size" refers to the area that will be fully-sampled (i.e., the array width is added to the length of each scan). The Array OTF map should only be selected if the frequency falls within the tuning range of the LFA or HFA (see table above). With the inputs, the calculator evaluates scanning in both x- and y-directions, and selects the direction that has fewer scan lines. It then estimates Non using the length of the scans and a frequency-based receiver stability time. The step sizes assumed for each frequency band are: HFA: 3 arcsec, LFA: 6 arcsec, 4GREAT1: 25 arcsec, 4GREAT2: 12 arcsec, 4GREAT3: 8 arcsec, 4GREAT4: 5 arcsec. Note that there are many ways to configure a mapping observation, and the calculated value of Non is only one of many possible values. For Raster maps: Enter the number of on positions that will be used for each reference position in the Non field. You may ignore the Map Size and Map Type fields.

Signal to Noise Ratio / Integration Time
If the SNR radio button is selected, enter the desired signal to noise ratio in this field and the estimated line strength in the Brightness Temperature field. The time estimator will calculate the integration time required to reach this SNR. If the Integration Time radio button is selected, enter the integration time (in seconds) for your observation. If your observation is a Total Power OTF map or a Total Power raster map, enter the ON-source time per map point. Otherwise, enter the ON+OFF integration time. The time estimator will calculate the 1-sigma rms sensitivity (in units of TR*) based on the input integration time.

Brightness Temperature TR* (K)
Enter the estimate of the peak brightness temperature of your line. This field only appears if the SNR radio button is selected (see above). As is the case for other heterodyne receivers that use hot and cold loads to measure the receiver temperature, the intensity units are Kelvin (K). The intensity scale used in the online tool is brightness temperature TR*. This relates to the measured antenna temperature as TA* = TR*ηfss and the main beam temperature (corrected for losses in the side lobes) as TMB = TR*mb . The main beam efficiency has been measured from planetary observations and determined to be 0.70 for the LFA, 0.63 for the HFA. For the latest 4GREAT main beam efficiencies, please contact the Help-Desk. A detailed description of the GREAT intensity calibration is given in Section, which also contains worked examples for different observing modes and unit conversions.

Source Velocity
Enter the source velocity (in km/s) in the LSR reference frame.

Observer Velocity
Enter the velocity of the observatory with respect to the LSR on the date of the observation. If this is unknown, you may either leave the default (0 km/s) or enter the date, time, coordinates, and location for your observation and the time estimator will calculate the observer velcity for you. Note that if your desired line rest frequency falls close to or in an atmospheric absorption feature, you may still be able to observe the line if you choose the right time of the year and your source is blue or redshifted to move you out of the atmospheric feature.

Return to Table of Contents

6.2.3   OTF Technical Details

In general, OTF schemes are flexible and the detailed map parameters will depend on the goals of the project. The two OTF mapping options for upGREAT are the classic OTF (which can be used with the upGREAT arrays or the single-pixel GREAT channels) and OTF Array (which can only be used with the LFA or HFA).

Both AOTs can be executed as either Beam Switching mode or Total Power mode. Some things to consider when deciding between these two modes are:

BSW maps spend an equal amount of time on the ON and OFF positions. In contrast, Total Power maps spend less time on the OFF position and are therefore more efficient.
Baseline Stability
BSW observations have better baseline stability. If the source is expected to have faint and/or wide lines, then BSW would be preferred. If the source is expected to have bright and/or narrow lines, then the baseline quality is less of an issue.
Reference positions
For a BSW map, there needs to be an emission-free region on the sky that is the same size as the OTF map and within a few arminutes of the map. This can sometimes be a challenge, especially in crowded regions. For Total Power maps, only single emission-free reference position is needed, and it can be farther away from the map (up to 30 arcmin, although baselines will be better for closer reference positions).

Return to Table of Contents   Coordinates and Array Geometry

Because upGREAT maps can be rotated relative to standard sky coordinates (e.g., J2000), they have their own coordinate system, defined by x and y. With a map rotation of 0 degrees, the +x axis is aligned with the +RA axis, and the +y axis is aligned with the +Dec axis (Fig. 6-2). Map rotation angle increases in the counter-clockwise direction, and the map angle can range from -360° to +360°. Scans in the x-direction are parallel to the x-axis, and scans in the y-direction are parallel to the y-axis.

Figure 6-2.
Diagram showing map angle of 0 degrees and map angle of plus 30 degrees

Figure 6-2. Left, The x/y map coordinate system is aligned with RA/Dec (J2000) for a map angle of 0°. Right, The x/y coordinate system at a map angle of +30°. The angle is measured in the counter-clockwise direction.

The upGREAT Low Frequency Array (2x7 beam, H and V polarizations) and High Frequency Array (HFA) are arranged in a hexagonal pattern with a central beam. The spacings between the beams are approximately 2 beam widths (31.7 arcsec for the LFA, 13.8 arcsec for the HFA). For efficient mapping, the array is typically rotated by 19.1 degrees relative to the scan direction, resulting in a projected pixel spacing of 10.4 arcsec for the LFA and 4.6 arecsec for the HFA (see Fig. 6-3). The array can be rotated independent of scanning direction for maximum flexibility of observation planning.

Figure 6-3.
Diagram showing pixel spacing for LFA and HFA

Figure 6-3. Left, The configuration of an upGREAT array. The numbers 0-6 mark the pixel numbers of the array, and the separation between the pixels, r, is 31.7 arcsec for the LFA, and 13.8 arcsec for the HFA. Right, An upGREAT array, rotated by -19.1° (pixel 1 is labeled) with arrows indicating the scan direction. The projected pixel spacing perpendicular to the scan direction is 10.4 arcsec for the LFA, and 4.6 arcsec for the HFA.

When creating a mapping strategy, observers will have to weigh many factors, including the area to be mapped, the required integration time per point, and of course the scientific objectives. Examples given in Section result in fully (or overly) sampled maps of the central region, but require different amounts of time to complete, and have very different integration times and coverage outside of the central region. In the Section, a point in the central region may be mapped by only a few pixels, while in the Section, the entire central region is mapped by each pixel . These are all important pieces of information to consider when planning mapping observations with upGREAT.

Return to Table of Contents   OTF Mapping

The classic OTF mapping is possible with either an upGREAT array or a single-pixel channel, and is the only OTF mapping option with a single pixel. In classic OTF mapping, each pixel makes a rectangular map based on the step size along the scan row, and the spacing between the scan rows. In the case of an upGREAT array, the result is seven rectangular maps; the amount of overlap between the maps depends on the map parameters (see Section In the case of a single-pixel GREAT channel, the result is a single rectangular map (see Section

Return to Table of Contents   upGREAT LFA Channel

In this example, we design an observation using the LFA such that the final map is composed of 14 fully sampled maps (one from each of the 2x7 pixels) of the central region. To ensure that all pixels cover the central region of the map during each scan, the scans start and end ½ of the array width before and after the central region in the x (RA) direction.

In addition, the top of the array is aligned with the bottom of the map, and each subsequent row is one step size (~6 arcseconds for the LFA) above the prior one (see Fig. 6-4). We use a 6 arcsecond step size along the row, which will result in a fully sampled map. We continue to make rows until the bottom of the array is aligned with the top of the map.

For this map, a scan length of 140 arcsec is sufficient to cover the central region and half of the array width before and after the central region. This scan length is also an multiple of the step size, which is a requirement for upGREAT maps. Based on the selected scan length and step size, each scan will have 20 points. Here we again select an integration time of 1 second per point, so each scan will take 20 seconds. The off position will require √20 ≈ 4.5 seconds, for a total of 24.5 seconds per scan. The entire map (including starting the map half of the array width below the central region and ending the map ½ of the array width above the central region) is made up of 20 rows. Thus, the total on+off time for the entire map is 490 seconds; after including a factor of 2 for overhead, the whole map takes  about 17 minutes. Every point within the central region would have an integration time of 14 seconds (the combination of 2 polarizations x 7 maps, one for each pixel, with an integration time of 1 second each).

Figure 6-4.
upGREAT LFA channel illustration

Figure 6-4. Overlay of OTF map implimenting the LFA configuration. Each long rectangle represents the region covered by a pixel during a scan. The red rectangles show the first scans of the map. The thick blue square shows the fully sampled region of the map. Green circles show the seven pixels of the upGREAT array at the reference position.

Note: In this example, if the other channel used for observing is a single pixel, a rectangular map will be created in this channel as well. Whether or not this map is fully sampled will depend on the frequency of the other channel and the step size used in the map.

Return to Table of Contents   4GREAT L1 Channel

In this example, we want to make a fully-sampled map of the filamentary cloud shown in Fig. 6-5 using L1, a single pixel channel. For this map, a rectangle of ~240 arcsec by ~128 arcsec, rotated by an angle of 45 degrees CCW, would cover the area of interest. If we select a step size of 8 arseconds, which would result in a fully-sampled map, we could scan in the long direction, with 30 (240 arcsec / 8 arcsec/dump) dumps along the scan row and 16 rows (128 arcsec / 8 arsec between rows). To keep the scan duration within 30 seconds, we select a dump time of 1 second per point. The off position will require √30 * 1 second ≈ 5.5 seconds, for a total of 35.5 seconds per scan. Thus, the total on+off time for the entire map is 568 seconds; after including a factor of 2 for overhead, the whole map takes about 19 minutes. Every point within the map would have an integration time of 1 second.

Figure 6-5.
4GREAT L1 Channel illustration

Figure 6-5. Overlay of OTF map in the L1 configuration. Each long rectangle represents the region covered by a pixel during a scan. This map is rotated by 45 degrees (CCW) to match the morphology of the filamentary cloud.

Return to Table of Contents   OTF Array Mapping

The basic unit of the upGREAT array mapping scheme is referred to as a block, which consists of a single or multiple scans of the same length, in the same direction (Fig. 6-6). For both the LFA and the HFA, the projected pixel spacing (after rotating the array by -19.1°) is such that a single scan results in an under-sampled map. To create a fully sampled map, it is necessary to make at least one more scan to fill in the gaps between pixels. The default behavior is to make a second scan, creating a fully sampled map and completing the block. It is possible, however, to scan only a single time (creating an under-sampled map), or more than two times (creating an oversampled map), depending on the goals of the project. 

Figure 6-6.
GREAT map blocks

A single map can consist of any number of blocks, and can scan in the x- or y- direction, or both. The parameters of the x- and y-direction scans are independent, but can be used in concert to create fully sampled maps of a region, scanning in both directions (Fig. 6-7). Scanning in both directions helps to minimize the striping effects that can be caused by the different characteristics of the array pixels.

Figure 6-7.
Diagram showing blocks scanned in different directions

Fig. 6-7. Left, A map composed of six blocks scanning in the x-direction. There are three blocks along the scan direction, and two blocks perpendicular to the scan direction. The region interior to the two vertical white lines shows the inner coverage region. Right, A map composed of six blocks scanning in the y-direction. There are two blocks along the scan direction, and three blocks perpendicular to the scan direction. The region interior to the two horizontal white lines shows the inner coverage region. Maps scanning in both directions can be set up to align the inner coverage regions of the two maps.

To calculate the size of the inner coverage region along the scan direction:
inner coverage = [(block length) * (# of blocks in scan direction) – 1] * (array size)
where block length is in units of the array size.
To calculate size of the inner coverage region perpendicular to the scan direction:
inner coverage = (# of blocks perpendicular to scan direction) * (array size)

Because of the flexibility of the mapping scheme, there can be multiple ways to observe the same region. For example, the two setups in Fig. 6-8 both fully cover the same area. Some important factors in determining the proper setup between these two options are the desired integration time per point, the step size between the points, and the duration of a single scan.

Figure 6-8.
Diagram showing two ways to observe the same region

Figure 6-8. Left, A map consisting of two blocks, each one 2*(array width) long. Right, A map consisting of a single block that is 4*(array width) long. The total inner coverage for both maps is the same.

Return to Table of Contents   upGREAT LFA Channel

In this example, the rotated array makes four total scans—two in the x- (RA) direction and two in the y- (Dec) direction Fig. 6-9. Because the projected pixel separation of 11 arcsec is larger than the beam size at 1.9 THz (14 arcsec), two scans in each direction are required to fully sample the area. These scans are separated by 5.5 arcsec (1/2 of the projected pixel separation), resulting in a slightly oversampled map.

To ensure that all pixels cover a part of the central region of the map during each scan, the scans start and end ½ of the array width before and after the central region. To get evenly spaced sampling, we select a 5.5 arcsecond step size along the rows. This step size, along with the ½ array length added to the beginning and end of the scan, results in a total scan length of 143 arcseconds (26 steps).

If we select 1 second integration time per point, each scan will take 26 seconds, and the off integration for each scan will take √26 ≈ 5 seconds. Thus, for the 4 scans that comprise the map, the total on+off time will be approximately 125 seconds. Including a factor of two for overhead, the total time for this map would be a little over four minutes, and each position in the central region of the map would have an integration time of ~4 seconds (2 seconds from each polarization).

Figure 6-9.
upGREAT LFA channel illustration

Figure 6-9. Overlay of OTF Array map utilizing the LFA configuration. Each long rectangle represents the region covered by a pixel during a scan. The red rectangles show the first scans of the map. The thick blue square shows the fully sampled region of the map. Green circles show the 2x7 pixels of the upGREAT array in the off position.

Note: In this example, if the other channel used for observing is a single-pixel, only an irregularly spaced map will be created in this channel. The shape of this will match the region traced out by the center array pixel.

Return to Table of Contents